Link to the article.
A quote I take from Jay-Z is, "When the grass is cut, the snakes will show."
That seems to be the lesson of this election. We were able to watch one after another republican candidates drop, as if  blue shells were given to each contestant in this mazing game of political Mario Kart. 
Here's the jist:
"Indeed, the extremism of his party is Mr Romney’s greatest 
handicap. The Democrats have their implacable fringe too: look at the 
teachers’ unions. But the Republicans have become a party of 
Torquemadas, forcing representatives to sign pledges never to raise 
taxes, to dump the chairman of the Federal Reserve and to embrace an 
ever more Southern-fried approach to social policy. Under President 
Romney, new conservative Supreme Court justices would try to overturn 
Roe v Wade, returning abortion policy to the states. The rights of 
immigrants (who have hardly had a good deal under Mr Obama) and gays 
(who have) would also come under threat. This newspaper yearns for the 
more tolerant conservatism of Ronald Reagan, where “small government” 
meant keeping the state out of people’s bedrooms as well as out of their
 businesses. Mr Romney shows no sign of wanting to revive it."
Thursday, November 1, 2012
GRE Preparation Wrath And Why This Fictious Zoo Would Have Bees in the Trapz. By Senator Wayne.
What kind of zoo would keep records of the percentage of each animal type but not the total population of the animals and animal types?! And then they have the gall to ask me how many leopards they now have after importing 8 more tigers into the zoo! 
This is not how zoo records are kept! It's like someone just lost all the preliminary data, but kept a pie chart. Can you really trust the pie chart without it's source? Plus without dates associated with these mysteriously obtained percentages, how can you possible know that the populations were sustained at the import date of the 8 new tigers?
 A lion gestation period is only 110 days. That's 4 months. You're 
telling me you've kept an eye on the pregnancies of all the feline 
animals in the zoo for 4 months, but didn't take the time to count them 
along with relating them to the total percentage among the feline 
population? Not likely. It probably takes about a 3-4 years to even gain
 ownership of 8 tigers, so this definitely wasn't a spur of the moment 
thing. 
8 tigers would be a huge increase in the total food and care needed by the feline department of any zoo. That would need precise measurements of development and sustaining care required for each population. If a zoo were keep logs of population sizes by mere percentage points without differentiating between mature, adolescent, and cub felines along with various factors concerning the diets of each specific cat, then their animals would inevitably suffer. Either this zoo is terrible, or these questions are wildly farfetched.
I'm probably over thinking these practice questions.
| I'd count these babies all day, everyday. | 
This is not how zoo records are kept! It's like someone just lost all the preliminary data, but kept a pie chart. Can you really trust the pie chart without it's source? Plus without dates associated with these mysteriously obtained percentages, how can you possible know that the populations were sustained at the import date of the 8 new tigers?
| 4 months of baby hiding and this whole scenario is whack. | 
| The likely owners of this crazed zoo. | 
8 tigers would be a huge increase in the total food and care needed by the feline department of any zoo. That would need precise measurements of development and sustaining care required for each population. If a zoo were keep logs of population sizes by mere percentage points without differentiating between mature, adolescent, and cub felines along with various factors concerning the diets of each specific cat, then their animals would inevitably suffer. Either this zoo is terrible, or these questions are wildly farfetched.
| Wise bear, tell me the number of your people. | 
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
